Sorry if it feels like I’ve been neglecting you. You’re worlds better than Facebook in every way <3 I’ve just been really busy creating some of the best material I’ve ever worked on, with some immensely beautiful and talented individuals. Once its ready, you’ll see it first, hopefully in a couple months. In the mean time, I’ve got a couple upcoming collaborations with dancers and performers I hope will inspire you.
Your chubby fangirl _does_ have a point. In the last six months you've posted exactly three photos of girls who could be considered chubby or more. There are almost exactly 200 photos of slim girls. The ratio between charismatic chubby girls and charismatic slim girls can hardly be 1:67. I know that it's a question with more than one answer and I'm not saying that you don't like big girls, I'm just saying that she deserves a better answer than that.
Its not a matter of any sort of magic ratio. The females that I can choose to work with of any body type are the ones that contact me, or who respond favorably when I contact them. From the ones that write me I look for people that look comfortable in front of the camera and have a wide range of poses in their arsenal.
Unfortunately there isn’t a very large number of “chubby” models out there that do nude work, and of those not every single one of them likes or is interested in being a part of my work.
I would normally spend more time on a question, but I’ve answered this before, and I’ve been traveling for two months taking care of this all on my phone. When somebody says something that shows me they haven’t taken the time to look at my work, I don’t feel particularly inclined to take the time to give them a long answer.
The idea that photographers can just shoot some specific body type whenever they want is not very realistic, especially if you’re talking about experienced models. It’s not Weird Science here. There are a limited amount of models out there who have the kind of qualities Corwin mentioned, and the pool is fairly self selective. The experienced models are going to be the ones who are shooting a lot and making their living modeling (or at least a good portion of it), and they are going to tend to be on the thinner side.
There are so many things that go into whether two people work together or when, some of it is pretty close to random chance. Photographers are not nearly as much in control of this situation as I think some people imagine, at least those of us who aren’t wealthy or super famous.
Beyond all that, the idea that a photographer should be shooting a certain type of model because someone else thinks so is just really misguided to me. We all have our own reasons for shooting what we do and our own ideas we’re trying to express. Those differences are what makes our art individual and personal.
Ironically, Corwin is someone that I’ve seen push the envelope a lot more than other photographers, in terms of the types of people he shoots. So seeing this sort of criticism directed at him really makes me scratch my head.
I’m not sure there’s really anything I can say eloquently here that hasn’t already been said, but this needs to be heard. I personally simply choose not to respond when people who don’t understand these thing come at me, because in my experience their minds are already made up and nothing I say or do will change their perspective…. but I would like it if more people understood that photographers are *constantly* taking flak from people accusing them of some sort of character flaw or moral deficiency because they do X, or don’t do Y.
On a somewhat related note, having worked with many models (and non-models), both male and female, I’ve found that the most confident people in front of the camera are performers, completely regardless of weight. For the most part in society weight seems to be a HUGE defining factor in positive self image, but when people are performers it suddenly becomes irrelevant (or much less relevant). I suspect this has to do with the fact that they derive their confidence from another source other than their physical appearance, that is to say, their talent. Belly dancers are just one of many examples that jump to mind, but perhaps the most frequent set I interact with who have more body mass than a typical professional model, yet are brimming with confidence.
At the rate things are going, I’ll probably have more followers on Tumblr than Facebook by the end of the year. This is going to necessitate a rethink of how much energy I put in to different social media platforms.
Lotus on Flickr.
Lotus was kind enough to invite me out to one of their shows in NY recently. Totally gorgeous lighting and presentation.
Snow Crash on Flickr.
Not the greatest form in the world since I’m out of practice…. nonetheless, here is some breathing in the snow. Enjoy.
photography by daaaaaaaaaaaaaaave parrott, e’rybody.
Haha thanks Cody! I must confess I’m actually just the subject here. The photographer was my sister Marta :)
In tarot, the Swords suit typically represents the intellectual mind and triumph of reason over emotion - sometimes to a fault.
Truth, change, duality, cleverness, balance, problem-solving, calculations, sharp (double) edges, cutting to the heart of the matter.
Been meaning to add a sword to my right sleeve for awhile now.
Tattoo by Alice Carrier at Wonderland Tattoo, Portland OR.
FWIW thats not just any sword, its the SAS dagger, also known as the Fairbairn–Sykes fighting knife. There’s some interesting heraldry at play here. The SAS motto is qui audet adipiscatur, a personal motto I adhere to. The infinite olive branch wrapped around the blade and pommel would suggest si vis pacem para bellum, the principle that you can achieve peace through superior fire power…. but perhaps the most interesting and important flourish of all resides at the bottom. The bent blade suggests a recognition of the inherent futility of war, and perhaps alters the olive branch’s meaning.
When you cut out all the extraneous details, life is simple.
Ignore the haters.
I’m posting this gif almost entirely because of this mans untuck…